SYDNEY: Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has rejected
a call from his government backbench to exempt the county's big four banks from
a tax package aimed at reducing company tax rate from 30 percent to 25 percent.
Speaking to reporters in Queenstown, New Zealand on Saturday,
Turnbull insisted that a company tax cut has to be applied without exemption.
"A company tax rate has got to really go across all
corporations," Turnbull said. "Distinguishing between one sector and
another is not a practical measure. I’m not aware of that ever being done in
any other jurisdiction."
Bankbench anger about Australia's highly profitable banking
sector has been stoked in recent times by a series of damaging scandals that
have raised questions about probity and culture at Australia's big four retail
banks, which last financial year reported a combined net profit of $29.65
billion.
Australia's top banks are the Commonwealth Bank of Australia,
Westpac Banking Corp, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group and National
Australia Bank.
Following release of the report “Financial Advice: Fees for no
service” by the Australian Securities Commission and Investments Commision
(ASIC) in October 2016, it emerged that Westpac, the ANZ, NAB and the
Commonwealth Bank had been ordered to return $178 million in refunds and
compensation to customers who had been unfairly billed for financial advice.
The reputational damage incurred by the advice scandal has been
compounded by revelations of interest rate rigging and the consistent refusal
of the major banks to pass on to consumers official rate cuts in their entirety.
In addition, some backbenchers argue that Australia's banks,
whose profits are heavily geared to real estate and the domestic economy, are
largely insulated from the kinds of global economic shocks which can seriously
harm other industries.
Turnbull on Saturday also reiterated his opposition to a banking
Royal Commission, saying the government's proposed one-stop shop financial
services ombudsman would be able to deal fairly with disputes between consumers
and financial services providers.
No comments:
Post a Comment